Friday, August 17, 2012

Blogs #3: Does Sedaris Know the Nuts and Bolts of College Writing?

     The ability to write a good essay is a skill that seemingly few people have. From essays that are just too dry and lack luster to essays that contain lengthy and unnecessary details it is hard to balance the good and the bad of writing. In The Nuts and Bolts of College Writing Michael Harvey explores what makes a piece of writing work and what doesn't. With tricks from concision to paragraph structures there are many helpful ideas to be found in strong writing. While reading other pieces of work, such as "Me Talk Pretty One Day" readers look to pick up how the author uses the techniques found in Harvey's book. I believe that in "Me Talk Pretty One Day" David Sedaris does an excellent job of implementing Harvey's keys to writing high level essays.
     In the first chapter of The Nuts and Bolts of College Writing Harvey discusses the importance of concision to a piece of writing. Concision is important to a piece of writing. It reduces the clutter and also aids the reader comprehension of a piece. Harvey states, "Concision can add remarkable grace to our prose. It also makes our prose easier to read and understand. Yet many of us are afraid of writing concisely because doing so can make us feel exposed" (Harvey 1). Sedaris adheres to this idea. He typically used enough detail that the reader could get a clear grasp of the story, but was concise enough that the passage was easy to understand and not be overwhelmed by. In the passage, "The two Polish Annas surely had clear notions of what they loved and hated, but like the rest of us, they were limited in terms of vocabulary, and this made them appear less than sophisticated" (Sedaris 12) Sedaris uses enough information that the reader gets a clear picture of the two classmates in which he is describing. He does so in a way that the reader does not get lost in the meaning of the sentence. In this passage Sedaris could have added several more details unnecessary details, but he did not and keeps this passage clear and concise.
     Another point that Harvey stresses in his book is the idea of importance of beginnings and endings  found in a piece of work. Focusing on the strategies of creating a good beginning Harvey provides many different ideas of how to make the opening of an essay strong. The importance of the length and how to create a context are highly emphasized along with several other ideas. Harvey says, "Good writers usually start an essay with something small- a story, a quotation, an example, a question, a detail, or the like- that connects to something big, the argument to be pursued" (Harvey 80). In "Me Talk Pretty One Day" Sedaris creates a smooth opening that keeps the readers interest. Sedaris starts his work by saying, "At the age of forty-one, I am returning to school and have to think of myself as what my French textbook calls 'a true debutant'" (Sedaris 11). Sedaris uses a small detail to connect to the idea of the rest of this passage which in turn helps create a small portion of his powerful opening. He also uses the length of the opening to his advantage. It is just the proper length in regards to the rest of this essay.
     Overall, Sedaris does a great job following the rules found in The Nuts and Bolts of College Writing. Sedaris creates a catchy opening that intrigues the reader while at the same time providing a clear idea of where his piece is heading. The body of his work, is quite clear and concise while still providing enough factual information that the reader can understand more about the authors experiences.

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Blog #2: Poetry Goals

1. Learn how to better identify the tone of a poem more accuratly
2. Learn more about the specific types of poems and the "rules" of how to make them
3. Carefully read every word of the poem, not just skim through (no matter how long it is)
4. Review poetry and literary vocabulary so I can better understand what the questions mean
5.  Read poems more carefully, so I can understand the underlying meaning, not just what is stated.

Typically when I read poems I will just skim through it. But by doing this I have realized that I am not truly grasping what I need to, to answer the questions. I believe this is partially because of my little knowledge of how poems can actually be structured and the different ways that they need to be read. This is in part due to the fact that I am a little rusty of the different poetry terms that I need to know in regards to these questions. Hopefully with more practice, reading poetry will come easier to me.

Blog #1: Diagnostic Test Reflection

     Overall, I found this test to be quite difficult. Partially because it was hard for me to read the long passages on the computer and have to scroll back and forth between the questions and the text. But as I got more into the test, I found more confidence in my testing. I found some of the passages to be a little hard and questions slightly confusing. Luckily though, some passages were easier than others. I found the Pride and Prejudice portion much easier than the rest. I believe that this is because I read this novel for my lit circle last year, and I also wrote a reasearch paper revolving around Pride and Prejudice and Jane Austen. I became very frustrated after that passage though, because I struggled recalling some of the most simple question. I think that my brain has been on summer vaction for a littler bit too long. When it came to the essays, I struggled to plan what I was going to write. But once I began the process, it began to come back to me. Unfortunatley none turned out well enough for my liking. I believe that for being on summer vacation though, I did pretty well. I am hoping that in the next year, being in AP Lit, I will be able to go back and do this test without any problems at all :).